Google said today that AI has revolutionized the company's translation system. Currently 50% of online content is in English, but only 20% of global Internet users use English as their primary language. Every day, Google Translate executes 1 billion times, with 1 billion monthly jobs and 92% outside the United States. The Google translation system is improved, not limited to English and Chinese. Each language can be converted to each other. In April 2017, 26 languages ​​have been supported. Through semantic analysis, the two languages ​​can be directly converted and trained for 2 months. Each sentence is 10 seconds and is greatly accelerated to 0.2 seconds. Quark Comments: In the past, Google translation used a phrase language, and the error was frequent. In 2016, the introduction of neural machine translation technology began to increase significantly. Quark Jun once again said that the true revolution of artificial intelligence will be reflected in the micro level of linguistics. Are the translators coming to class soon? On April 27th, famous physicist Stephen Hawking gave a video speech at the Global Mobile Internet Conference in Beijing. Hawking reiterated that the rise of artificial intelligence is either the best thing for mankind or the worst thing. He believes that human beings need to be alert to the threat of artificial intelligence development, because once artificial intelligence is out of bounds and redesigned itself in an accelerating state, human beings will not be able to compete with it and be replaced. In my life, I have witnessed profound changes in society, the most profound of which is also the change of human influence, which is the rise of artificial intelligence. In short, I think the rise of powerful artificial intelligence is either the best in human history or the worst. I have to say that we are still uncertain whether it is good or bad. But we should do everything we can to ensure that its future development benefits us and our environment. We have no choice. I believe that the development of artificial intelligence is itself a problem with problems that must be resolved now and in the future. The research and development of artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing. Perhaps all of us should pause for a while, shifting our research from the promotion of artificial intelligence to the maximization of the social benefits of artificial intelligence. Based on this consideration, the American Artificial Intelligence Association (AAAI) established the long-term future general fundraising forum for artificial intelligence from 2008 to 2009. They recently invested a lot of attention in the purpose-oriented neutral technology. But our artificial intelligence system needs to work according to our will. Interdisciplinary research is a possible way forward: from economics, law, philosophy to computer security, formal methods, and of course the various branches of artificial intelligence itself. On April 27th, Hawking gave a video speech and an interview at the Global Mobile Internet Conference. (Time is 28 minutes, it is recommended to watch in wifi environment.) Everything that civilization produces is a product of human intelligence. I believe that there is no essential difference between what a biological brain can achieve and what a computer can achieve. Therefore, it follows the principle that "computers can theoretically imitate human intelligence and then transcend". But we are not sure, so we can't know if we will get the help of artificial intelligence infinitely, or be despised and marginalized, or it may be destroyed by it. Indeed, we are worried that smart machines will be able to replace the work that humans are doing and quickly eliminate millions of jobs. While artificial intelligence has evolved from its original form and proved to be very useful, I am also concerned about the result of creating something that can equal or transcend humans: once artificial intelligence is out of bondage, it redesigns itself in an accelerating state. Human beings cannot compete with them due to the limitations of long biological evolution and will be replaced. This will bring great damage to our economy. In the future, artificial intelligence can develop self-will and a will to conflict with us. Although I have always been optimistic about humans, others believe that humans can control the development of technology for a long time, so that we can see the potential of artificial intelligence to solve most of the world's problems. But I am not sure. In January 2015, I signed an open letter on artificial intelligence with technology entrepreneur Elon Musk and many other artificial intelligence experts to promote serious research on the impact of artificial intelligence on society. Prior to this, Elon Musk warned people that superhuman artificial intelligence may bring immeasurable benefits, but if not properly deployed, it may have the opposite effect on humans. I am with him at the Scientific Advisory Board of the Institute for the Future of Life, an organization that mitigates the risks that humanity faces, and the aforementioned open letter was drafted by this organization. This public signalling campaign can prevent direct research on potential problems, as well as the potential benefits of artificial intelligence, while working to make artificial intelligence developers more concerned with artificial intelligence security. In addition, for decision makers and the general public, this open letter is informative and not alarmist. Everyone knows that artificial intelligence researchers are seriously thinking about these concerns and ethical issues, which we think is very important. For example, artificial intelligence has the potential to eradicate disease and poverty, but researchers must be able to create controllable artificial intelligence. The four-word, open-ended letter entitled "Priority to Study Strong and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence," detailed the study's prioritization in its accompanying twelve-page document. Over the past 20 years, artificial intelligence has focused on the problems that arise around building intelligent agents, that is, systems that can be perceived and acted upon in a particular environment. In this case, intelligence is a rational concept related to statistics and economics. In a nutshell, this is an ability to make good decisions, plans, and inferences. Based on these efforts, a large amount of integration and cross-prediction is applied in artificial intelligence, machine learning, statistics, cybernetics, neuroscience, and other fields. The establishment of a shared theoretical framework, combined with data supply and processing capabilities, has achieved significant success in various subdivisions. Examples include speech recognition, image classification, autopilot, machine translation, gait movement, and question and answer systems. With the development of these fields, a virtuous circle is formed from laboratory research to technologies of economic value. Even small performance improvements can bring huge economic benefits, which in turn encourage longer-term, greater investment and research. It is widely recognized that the research on artificial intelligence is developing steadily, and its impact on society is likely to expand. The potential benefits are enormous. Since everything produced by civilization is a product of human intelligence; we cannot predict that we may obtain What results, when this intelligence is magnified by artificial intelligence tools. But, as I said, eradicating disease and poverty is not entirely impossible. Because of the enormous potential of artificial intelligence, it is important to study how to benefit from artificial intelligence and avoid risks. Research on artificial intelligence is now rapidly evolving. This research can be discussed in the short and long term. Some short-term concerns are about driverlessness, from civilian drones to autonomous driving. For example, in an emergency, a driverless car has to choose between a small risky accident and a high probability of a small accident. Another concern is the deadly intelligence of autonomous weapons. Should they be banned? If so, how exactly should “autonomy†be defined? If not, how should any negligence of misuse and failure be accountable? There are other concerns that artificial intelligence can gradually interpret the privacy and concerns caused by large amounts of monitoring data and how to manage the economic impact of replacing jobs with artificial intelligence. Long-term concerns are mainly the potential risks of out-of-control of artificial intelligence systems. With the rise of super-intelligence that does not follow human will, that powerful system will threaten humanity. Is the result of such misplacement possible? If so, how did these situations occur? What kind of research should we invest in to better understand and solve the dangers of the rise of dangerous super-smart, or the emergence of intelligent outbreaks? Current tools for controlling artificial intelligence technologies, such as reinforcement learning, and simple and practical functions, are not enough to solve this problem. Therefore, we need further research to find and confirm a reliable solution to control this problem. Recent milestones, such as the autonomous driving cars mentioned earlier and the artificial intelligence winning the game of chess, are signs of future trends. A huge investment is devoted to this technology. Our current achievements are inevitably dwarfed by what we might achieve in the coming decades. And we are far from predicting what we can achieve, when our minds are magnified by artificial intelligence. Perhaps with the help of this new technological revolution, we can solve some of the damage that industrialization has caused to nature. Everything about our lives is about to be changed. In short, the success of artificial intelligence is probably the biggest event in the history of human civilization. But artificial intelligence may also be the end of the history of human civilization, unless we learn how to avoid danger. I have said that the all-round development of artificial intelligence may lead to the demise of human beings, such as maximizing the use of intelligent autonomous weapons. Earlier this year, I and some scientists from all over the world jointly supported their ban on nuclear weapons at United Nations conferences. We are anxiously awaiting the outcome of the negotiations. At present, the nine nuclear powers can control about 14,000 nuclear weapons. Any one of them can razing the city to the ground. Radioactive waste will pollute the farmland on a large scale. The most terrible harm is the nuclear winter, fire and smoke. Leading to the small ice age of the world. This result has caused the collapse of the global food system and the turmoil of the end, which is likely to cause most people to die. As scientists, we have a special responsibility for nuclear weapons, because it was the scientists who invented them and found that their effects were more terrible than originally thought. At this stage, my discussion of the disaster may have scared everyone in the room. very sorry. But as a participant today, it is important that you recognize your position in the future development of the current technology. I believe that we are united to call for the support of international treaties or to sign open letters to governments. Science and technology leaders and scientists are doing everything they can to avoid the rise of uncontrollable artificial intelligence. Last October, I established a new institution in Cambridge, England, to try to solve some of the inconclusive problems that have arisen in the rapid development of artificial intelligence research. The Liverpool Smart Future Center is an interdisciplinary research institute dedicated to the future of intelligence, which is critical to the future of our civilization and species. We spend a lot of time learning history and going deeper – most of it is about stupid history. So people turn to the future of intelligence is a welcome change. Although we are aware of the potential dangers, I am still optimistic in my heart. I believe that the potential benefits of creating intelligence are enormous. Perhaps with the tools of this new technological revolution, we will be able to reduce the damage done by industrialization to nature. Every aspect of our lives will be changed. My colleague at the Institute, Hugh Prince, admitted that the "Liver Hume Center" could be established, in part because the university established the "Existing Risk Center." The latter has examined the potential problems of humanity more extensively, and the focus of the “Liver Hume Center†is relatively narrow. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, including the European Parliament's call for drafting a series of regulations to manage innovation in robotics and artificial intelligence. What is surprising is that it involves a form of electronic personality to ensure the rights and responsibilities of the most capable and advanced artificial intelligence. A spokesperson for the European Parliament commented that as more and more areas of everyday life are increasingly influenced by robots, we need to ensure that robots serve humanity, now and in the future. The report to the members of the European Parliament clearly states that the world is at the forefront of the new industrial robot revolution. Whether the analysis provides the robot with the right to be an electronic person, which is equivalent to the legal person, may be possible. The report emphasizes that at all times, research and design personnel should ensure that each robot design includes a termination switch. In Kubrick's film "2001 Space Roaming", the failed supercomputer Hal did not let scientists enter the space capsule, but that is science fiction. What we have to face is the fact. Lorna Blazel, a partner at Osborne Clark's multinational law firm, said in the report that we don't recognize the personality of whales and gorillas, so there is no need to rush to accept a robotic personality. But worry has always existed. The report acknowledges that artificial intelligence may transcend human intelligence over a period of decades, and artificial intelligence may transcend human intelligence and challenge human-machine relationships. The report concludes by calling for the establishment of European robotics and artificial intelligence institutions to provide technical, ethical and regulatory expertise. If a member of the European Parliament votes in favor of legislation, the report will be submitted to the European Commission. It will decide which legislative steps to take in three months. We should also play a role in ensuring that the next generation not only has the opportunity but also the determination to fully participate in scientific research at an early stage so that they can continue to realize their potential and help humanity create a better world. This is what I mean when I first talk about the importance of learning and education. We need to jump out of the theoretical discussion of “how things should be†and take action to ensure that they have the opportunity to participate. We stand at the entrance to a beautiful new world. This is an exciting world full of uncertainty, and you are the forerunners. I bless you. SHENZHEN CHONDEKUAI TECHNOLOGY CO.LTD , https://www.szfourinone.com