Efficient lighting promotion re-emerged to highlight policy features

Following the promotion of 3 times in 2008, 2009 and 2010, the promotion of efficient lighting in 2011 has begun again. From the perspective of the tender documents and the opening of bids, this fourth departure led to a significant increase in the degree of promotion and policy functions.

More Selective It is understood that users of high-efficiency lighting product promotion in 2011 will have more choices. This is mainly reflected in the requirements of the tender documents. It is understood that the general lighting self-ballasted fluorescent lamp promotion project includes 4 packages, namely 5W-8W, 9W-14W, 18W-24W and 25W-60W. The bidding documents require that the first package (5-8W), the second package (9-14W), and the third package (18-24W) must be submitted at the same time. For the first package (5-8W), the second package (9-14W), and the third package (18-24W), if each bidder submits U-shaped and spiral-type products at the same time, they must quote separately. Type can only report one price; for the fourth package (25-60W), a price is reported for each specification and model product. In 2010, there was no mandatory requirement in this respect. It was only proposed that bidders could vote for one or more packages.

For the above-mentioned provisions of the bidding documents, the responsible person of the relevant department stated that the 1, 2 and 3 packages must be submitted at the same time, which will enable each winning brand to include a variety of winning products in order to enhance the richness of the winning products. Users have more room for choice. At the same time, U-shaped and spiral-type products are quoted separately, which also allows the user to choose the appearance of the product according to personal preference and demand characteristics.

More prominent environmental protection, energy conservation and environmental protection have always been the green theme of efficient lighting promotion. In 2011, the green environmental protection policy function was further upgraded in this tender. This is mainly reflected in the requirements for the use of mercury for tender products.

Compared with the use of mercury in the tender documents of last year, the promotion of high-efficiency lighting in 2011 has placed stricter requirements on mercury content. In 2010, the bidding document for self-ballasted fluorescent lamps for general lighting stipulated that mercury was used for tendered products. "The tender must be made of solid mercury or mercury, and the content is not more than 5mg as the minimum requirement; this tender encourages low mercury, for 5W- 24W, below 3.5mg, given different degrees of extra points. "Compared to the 2010 tender documents, the content of not more than 3.5mg as the minimum requirement. In the same way, last year's bidding documents for three primary colors and high-frequency double-end fluorescent lamps and stents required that “the tender product must be made of solid mercury or mercury, and the content is not more than 8mg as the minimum requirement; this tender encourages low mercury, and less than 5mg gives different degrees. Plus points.” And in 2011 the bidding documents required that the tender product must be packed with solid mercury or mercury, and the content of not more than 5mg is the minimum requirement. It is not difficult to see from the above that the requirements for the use of mercury in efficient lighting promotion have been greatly improved.

The setting of the score criteria for more open bidding documents is often the direction of the direction of the bidding policy.

In 2011, compared with last year, the efficiency lighting promotion rating standards mainly focused on the distribution of scores. In 2010, the scores of the four major scoring factors of the bidder’s business qualifications, the quality of the tendered products, the ability of the bidders’ promotion services and the bid price of the bidders were 8 points, 46 points, 14 points and 32 points respectively. In the case of the 2011 tender, where the bid quality of the bid and the ability of the bidder’s promotion service were both kept unchanged, the bidder’s commercial qualifications and bid price quotation were re-adjusted, and the bidder’s commercial qualification was reduced to 5 points, and the offer price of the tender product was increased to 35 points. It can be seen that through this adjustment of the score scores, the bid evaluation process will pay more attention to the bid price of the bid product, while the bidder’s business qualification is relatively lower than the threshold, which virtually provides for small and medium-sized lighting companies to participate in bid bidding. More possible opportunities. At the same time, the increase in the bid price points will also help further push down the agreement supply price, allowing users to get more benefits.